From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Remove early stack deallocation from restore_user_regs
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 17:06:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B00AAE.1050504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109164608.GV12302@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 09/01/15 16:46, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:12:38PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> Currently restore_user_regs deallocates the SVC stack early in
>> its execution and relies on no exception being taken between
>> the deallocation and the registers being restored. The introduction
>> of a default FIQ handler that also uses the SVC stack breaks this
>> assumption and can result in corrupted register state.
>>
>> This patch works around the problem by removing the early
>> stack deallocation and using r2 as a temporary instead. I have
>> not found a way to do this without introducing an extra mov
>> instruction to the macro.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>
> Please put it in the patch system, thanks.
Will do.
> I think we should queue
> this one for stable too, as I think we need this for v3.18
> (as a result of c0e7f7ee717e2b4c5791e7422424c96b5008c39e,
> ARM: 8150/3: fiq: Replace default FIQ handler)?
It's a close call.
Before 8150/3 the system would probably crash if the default FIQ handler
ran. After 8150/3 the system is also likely to crash since there's no
code hooked into the handler in v3.18 that can clear the source of FIQ
leaving us stuck re-entering the FIQ handler.
Nevertheless, this is a nasty gremlin to leave for backporters (it
wasn't easy to find) so I'd be very happy to Cc: stable and see what
they think.
Daniel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 11:11 [RFC PATCH] arm: Remove early stack deallocation from restore_user_regs Daniel Thompson
2015-01-05 15:12 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Thompson
2015-01-09 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-09 17:06 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2015-01-09 17:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-09 19:16 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B00AAE.1050504@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).