From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:34:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B355FA.60702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109175936.GB13161@redhat.com>
On Friday 09 January 2015 11:29 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/31, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>
>> +int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> + probe_opcode_t insn;
>> +
>> + insn = *(probe_opcode_t *)(&auprobe->insn[0]);
>> +
>> + switch (arm_probe_decode_insn(insn, &auprobe->ainsn)) {
>> + case INSN_REJECTED:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + case INSN_GOOD_NO_SLOT:
>> + auprobe->simulate = true;
>> + if (auprobe->ainsn.prepare)
>> + auprobe->ainsn.prepare(insn, &auprobe->ainsn);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case INSN_GOOD:
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> forgot to mention... shouldn't it also check IS_ALIGNED(addr, AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) ?
>
> I do not know if unaligned insn address is valid on arm64 or not, but please
AARCH64 instructions are always of fixed lenght ie 4 bytes. I do not see
possibility of addr being unaligned. Please let me know, if I am missing
something.
> note that at least it should not cross the page boundary, set_swbp() needs to
> write AARCH64_INSN_SIZE == UPROBE_SWBP_INSN bytes and it assumes that this
> should fit the single page.
So, again I do not see the possibility of crossing of page boundary for
any instruction address.
~Pratyush
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-31 15:21 [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2015-01-01 1:59 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <0694af6935f9c6873ef8d25ad51630a40a74a116.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 17:23 ` [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:49 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-04 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-05 4:17 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:54 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 4:50 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 5:04 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-01-12 6:45 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <c40bb09f1edad6899c3855eb56bf4a4f541c49f7.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 17:43 ` [RFC 3/8] Kernel/uprobe: Define arch_uprobe_exception_notify as __weak Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <f41f96aaed90007076ce496b9a0746c6f1a01ddb.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 17:51 ` [RFC 5/8] ARM64: Re-factor flush_ptrace_access Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-02 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <1e0a9e778669bb2a2e40bf101eff8ae85110ce54.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 18:05 ` [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-08 17:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:51 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <5beb1ff58d4928a873be5e898b62d8cc2003ec7c.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-08 16:55 ` [RFC 1/8] ARM64: Move BRK opcodes defines from kprobes.h to insn.h Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:31 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <9a86c217f387f45568c18b724024b0d3e040d2c6.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-08 16:55 ` [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:33 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:39 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <028aab951a24c56075b1060afa1c2b2d88c09083.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-08 16:59 ` [RFC 4/8] ARM64: Add instruction_pointer_set function Will Deacon
2015-01-09 5:18 ` Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B355FA.60702@redhat.com \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).