From: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com (Masami Hiramatsu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization.
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:24:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B3AED2.5070000@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420461075-27012-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
(2015/01/05 21:31), Wang Nan wrote:
> In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
>
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>
> This is because original code checks kprobes_all_disarmed in
> optimize_kprobe(), but this flag is turned off after calling that
> function. Therefore, optimize_kprobe() will see
> kprobes_all_disarmed == true and doesn't do the optimization.
OK, a workaround is to disable/enable optimizing via sysctl.
>
> This patch simply turns off kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable
> optimization.
>
Anyway, thank you for finding that! :)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index bad4e95..b185464 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -2320,6 +2320,12 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
> if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
> goto already_enabled;
>
> + /*
> + * optimize_kprobe() called by arm_kprobe() checks
> + * kprobes_all_disarmed, so set kprobes_all_disarmed before
> + * arm_kprobe.
> + */
> + kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
> /* Arming kprobes doesn't optimize kprobe itself */
> for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> head = &kprobe_table[i];
> @@ -2328,7 +2334,6 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
> arm_kprobe(p);
> }
>
> - kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
> printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally enabled\n");
>
> already_enabled:
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 12:31 [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization Wang Nan
2015-01-12 11:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-01-20 3:02 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-20 7:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-19 0:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B3AED2.5070000@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).