From: s-anna@ti.com (Suman Anna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Fix _wait_target_ready() for hwmods without sysc
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:56:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B5CCDA.4040304@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1501132324150.28034@utopia.booyaka.com>
Hi Paul,
On 01/13/2015 05:29 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Suman,
>
> thanks for pitching in on this!
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> You have removed the return from the above block on failure. If any DT
>> entry doesn't have the reg property, this will hang the kernel boot.
>> Just remove the "reg" entry from any of the existing DT, and you will
>> run into the issue, this is what 6423d6df1440 ("ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod:
>> check for module address space during init") fixed.
>
> Seems like that's the problem that we need to track down, then. If a
> hwmod has no MPU-accessible registers, it should still be possible to
> init the clocks for the device, etc. ...
Yes true, and I should have rephrased above statement a little better -
its for modules with sysc but with no reg property to supply the base
for the module's SYSCONFIG or SYSSTATUS registers. The commit
6423d6df1440 has the explanation for the hang.
>
>> Also, are you sure you want to turn the WARN into a pr_debug, it won't
>> even show during the kernel boot log if the reg base is missing.
>
> No, I'm not sure :-) I guess it depends how many hwmods we'll have with
> no MPU-accessible registers. We don't seem to have address ranges for the
> interconnects defined; we could fix that fairly easily.
The WARN_ON previously was to throw a eye-catchy print for the case
where hwmods have sysc but no address space defined (is an error
usually, but this is what we run into during the DT conversion of a
device as the hwmod and DTS changes come in through separate topic
branches). I still think that the sysc check should be before the check
for _HWMOD_NO_MPU_PORT, a module with sysc mandates it has an MPU port.
regards
Suman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1418917790-1791-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
[not found] ` <5492F84E.7020706@ti.com>
2015-01-02 21:10 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Fix _wait_target_ready() for hwmods without sysc Paul Walmsley
2015-01-05 8:35 ` Lokesh Vutla
2015-01-05 19:53 ` Suman Anna
2015-01-05 22:19 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-05 22:19 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-05 22:31 ` santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com
2015-01-06 2:04 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-06 8:14 ` Lokesh Vutla
2015-01-06 17:14 ` Suman Anna
2015-01-06 17:27 ` Suman Anna
2015-01-06 22:10 ` Suman Anna
2015-01-13 23:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-13 23:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-14 1:56 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2015-01-07 11:20 ` Roger Quadros
2015-01-13 23:46 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-14 12:26 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B5CCDA.4040304@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).