From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: at91/dt: add AIC irq1 muxed peripheral id definitions
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:40:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B671DA.7020009@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150114143448.09d362b8@bbrezillon>
Le 14/01/2015 14:34, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:47 +0100
> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:
>
>> Le 13/01/2015 19:46, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
>>> These ids will be used to define irqs multiplexed on the first irq line.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h b/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..e14a94f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER_ARM_GIC_H
>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER_ARM_GIC_H
>>
>> Nit.: why ARM_GIC?
>
> Because I copied it from the arm-gic.h header and forgot to rename
> those macros :-).
> I'll fix that.
>
>>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>> +
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMC 0
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_ST 1
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PIT 1
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_DBGU 2
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_RTC 3
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_RTT 4
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_WATCHDOG 5
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_MC 6
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_SDRAMC 6
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_DDRSDRC 6
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_RSTC 7
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMERRLOC 8
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMECC 9
>
> Following up the discussion we had privately regarding these
> macros (whether we really need them or not), maybe adding a comment
> above the irqs property would be enough:
>
> dumb_irq1_demux: dumb-irq-demux at 1 {
> compatible = "irqchip-dumb-demux";
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> /*
> * Interrupt lines:
> * 0: PMC
> * 1: PIT
> * 2: DBGU
> * 3: RTT
> * 4: WATCHDOG
> * 5: RSTC
> */
> irqs = <0x3f>;
> };
Well, I tend to prefer when no additional macros are defined in DT for
no real added value. So, this comment seems to be enough... I would vote
for this solution ;-)
Thanks, bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 18:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] irqchip: add dumb demultiplexer implementation Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-14 8:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 3:26 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-14 8:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-14 22:24 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-14 22:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-15 9:44 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-15 9:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-15 9:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-15 15:40 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-20 13:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-14 13:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-14 14:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 14:43 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] irqchip: Add DT binding doc for dumb demuxer chips Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 19:00 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-13 20:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 18:56 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-14 19:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 19:33 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-14 13:42 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: select DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX for all at91 SoCs Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:45 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: at91/dt: add AIC irq1 muxed peripheral id definitions Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-14 13:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:40 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: at91/dt: define a dumb irq demultiplexer chip connected on irq1 Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:48 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B671DA.7020009@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).