linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: at91/dt: add AIC irq1 muxed peripheral id definitions
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:40:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B671DA.7020009@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150114143448.09d362b8@bbrezillon>

Le 14/01/2015 14:34, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:47 +0100
> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Le 13/01/2015 19:46, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
>>> These ids will be used to define irqs multiplexed on the first irq line.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h   | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h b/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..e14a94f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER_ARM_GIC_H
>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER_ARM_GIC_H
>>
>> Nit.: why ARM_GIC?
> 
> Because I copied it from the arm-gic.h header and forgot to rename
> those macros :-).
> I'll fix that.
> 
>>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>> +
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMC		0
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_ST		1
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PIT		1
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_DBGU		2
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_RTC		3
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_RTT		4
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_WATCHDOG	5
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_MC		6
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_SDRAMC		6
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_DDRSDRC	6
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_RSTC		7
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMERRLOC	8
>>> +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMECC		9
> 
> Following up the discussion we had privately regarding these
> macros (whether we really need them or not), maybe adding a comment
> above the irqs property would be enough:
> 
> 	dumb_irq1_demux: dumb-irq-demux at 1 {
> 		compatible = "irqchip-dumb-demux";
> 		interrupt-controller;
> 		#interrupt-cells = <1>;
> 		interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> 		/*
> 		 * Interrupt lines:
> 		 * 0: PMC
> 		 * 1: PIT
> 		 * 2: DBGU
> 		 * 3: RTT
> 		 * 4: WATCHDOG
> 		 * 5: RSTC
> 		 */
> 		irqs = <0x3f>;
> 	};

Well, I tend to prefer when no additional macros are defined in DT for
no real added value. So, this comment seems to be enough... I would vote
for this solution ;-)

Thanks, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-13 18:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] irqchip: add dumb demultiplexer implementation Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 21:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-14  8:31     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14  3:26   ` Rob Herring
2015-01-14  8:22     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 10:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-14 22:24       ` Rob Herring
2015-01-14 22:55         ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-15  9:44           ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-15  9:11         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-15  9:26           ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-15 15:40           ` Rob Herring
2015-01-20 13:08             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-14 13:36   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-14 14:03     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 14:43       ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] irqchip: Add DT binding doc for dumb demuxer chips Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 19:00   ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-13 20:52     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 18:56       ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-14 19:08         ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 19:33           ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-14 13:42   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: select DUMB_IRQ_DEMUX for all at91 SoCs Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:45   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: at91/dt: add AIC irq1 muxed peripheral id definitions Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:21   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-14 13:34     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:40       ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-01-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: at91/dt: define a dumb irq demultiplexer chip connected on irq1 Boris Brezillon
2015-01-14 13:48   ` Nicolas Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B671DA.7020009@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).