From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Add the support for Exynos 64bit SoC
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:02:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B692FB.7030703@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B69072.4080607@kernel.org>
On 01/14/2015 04:51 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 01/14/15 14:33, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> + Doug, Olof
>
>> This patch adds the support for Exynos 64bit SoC. The delay_timer is only used
>> for Exynos 32bit SoC.
>>
> Yes, the Exynos MCT(Multi-Core Timer) is 64bit timer and it is available
> on 64bit exynos SoC such as exynos7. But basically ARMv8 architecture is
> including ARM ARCH timer (ARM Generic Timer) and exynos7 also has
> implemented it and additionally its access is faster than using memory
> mapped register called SFR for MCT...so Doug submitted patch to use MCT
> on 32bit exynos SoCs before.
>
> I know using MCT on 64bit exynos is usefulness for Power Management and
> I need to talk to relevant guys in office again. If anything, I'll let
> you know.
I will wait for your answer before digging more the patch.
Thanks
-- Daniel
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> This patch set is tested on 64-bit Exynos SoC. I send only this patch from
>> following patchst[1].
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/134
>>
>> Changes from v2:
>> - None
>> Changes from v1:
>> - Use CONFIG_ARM instead of CONFIG_ARM64
>>
>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 1 -
>> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>> index fc01ec2..be38119 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>> @@ -135,7 +135,6 @@ config CLKSRC_METAG_GENERIC
>>
>> config CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT
>> def_bool y if ARCH_EXYNOS
>> - depends on !ARM64
>> help
>> Support for Multi Core Timer controller on Exynos SoCs.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
>> index 9403061..b840ea1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static u64 notrace exynos4_read_sched_clock(void)
>> return exynos4_read_count_32();
>> }
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
>> static struct delay_timer exynos4_delay_timer;
>>
>> static cycles_t exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
>> @@ -231,14 +232,17 @@ static cycles_t exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
>> "cycles_t needs to move to 32-bit for ARM64 usage");
>> return exynos4_read_count_32();
>> }
>> +#endif
>>
>> static void __init exynos4_clocksource_init(void)
>> {
>> exynos4_mct_frc_start();
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
>> exynos4_delay_timer.read_current_timer = &exynos4_read_current_timer;
>> exynos4_delay_timer.freq = clk_rate;
>> register_current_timer_delay(&exynos4_delay_timer);
>> +#endif
>>
>> if (clocksource_register_hz(&mct_frc, clk_rate))
>> panic("%s: can't register clocksource\n", mct_frc.name);
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 5:33 [RESEND PATCH v3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Add the support for Exynos 64bit SoC Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-14 15:51 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-01-14 16:02 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-01-14 23:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-15 11:29 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-15 12:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-15 12:52 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-15 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 0:03 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-19 0:54 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-19 9:27 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-19 10:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B692FB.7030703@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).