From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:28:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: imx6: Fix procedure to switch the parent of LDB_DI_CLK In-Reply-To: References: <1420559265-7333-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <1420559265-7333-3-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20150108130003.GE4928@dragon> Message-ID: <54B8D9CE.40300@de.bosch.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 15.01.2015 17:54, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > >> Before I start reviewing the patch, I would like to know if there is a >> formal errata for this issue, including the bug description, recommended >> workaround, and affected i.MX6 variants etc. > > The latest mx6 reference manual available on the web shows the LDB > clock gate in the correct position now. > > It also adds the following note: > > "NOTE: This clock path is not controlled by a clock gate (CG). For > proper clock switching procedures refer to the Clock Switching > Multiplexers section." > > There is no formal errata available. > > Please consider reviewing this series, as it addresses a real problem > that affect many users. Just to get a better understanding for the background of this series: Are the patches in this series somehow related to Shawn's ENGR00318063-x patches in the FSL 3.10.53_1.1.0_ga kernel: http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/log/?h=imx_3.10.53_1.1.0_ga&qt=grep&q=ENGR00318063 ? Or are this completely different topics? Best regards Dirk