From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: wangyijing@huawei.com (Yijing Wang)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:14:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 08/28] PCI: Introduce pci_host_assign_domain_nr() to assign
 domain
In-Reply-To: <3026954.09KG7UaUTi@wuerfel>
References: <1421372666-12288-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
 <1421372666-12288-9-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
 <13182982.DnZJMY2KHL@wuerfel> <3026954.09KG7UaUTi@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <54BC6894.6060500@huawei.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

>> I'm confused: the same code is already part of the PCI tree, but with
>> Lorenzo Pieralisi listed as the patch author. The code is good,
>> and I acked it in the past, but one of you is (probably by accident)
>> misattributing the patch.
>>
>> Assuming that the patch that is already merged in next is the right
>> one, I think you should rebase your series on top of
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git#next
>>
>> to avoid conflicts like this one.
>>
> 
> I think I just got confused because the code duplicates most of
> pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(). Maybe this can be done in a better way
> by splitting the existing function into 
> 
> static int pci_assign_domain_nr(struct device *)
> {
> 	... /* most of pci_bus_assign_domain_nr */
> 
> 	return domain;
> }
> 
> void pci_host_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> {
> 	host->domain = pci_assign_domain_nr(host->dev.parent);
> }
> 
> void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent)
> {
> 	bus->domain_nr = pci_assign_domain_nr(parent);
> }
> 

Hi Arnd,
   I kept the almost duplicated pci_host_assign_domain_nr() and
pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() here for building happy, because now
platform specific pci_domain_nr() still exists which may get domain
number from pci_bus. pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() will be removed in
the last patch.

Thanks!
Yijing.

> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing