From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Add the support for Exynos 64bit SoC
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:27:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BCCE16.8050607@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BC55BB.7050809@samsung.com>
On 01/19/2015 01:54 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Daniel and Kukjin,
>
> On 01/15/2015 01:02 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 01/14/2015 04:51 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> On 01/14/15 14:33, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> + Doug, Olof
>>>
>>>> This patch adds the support for Exynos 64bit SoC. The delay_timer is only used
>>>> for Exynos 32bit SoC.
>>>>
>>> Yes, the Exynos MCT(Multi-Core Timer) is 64bit timer and it is available
>>> on 64bit exynos SoC such as exynos7. But basically ARMv8 architecture is
>>> including ARM ARCH timer (ARM Generic Timer) and exynos7 also has
>>> implemented it and additionally its access is faster than using memory
>>> mapped register called SFR for MCT...so Doug submitted patch to use MCT
>>> on 32bit exynos SoCs before.
>>>
>>> I know using MCT on 64bit exynos is usefulness for Power Management and
>>> I need to talk to relevant guys in office again. If anything, I'll let
>>> you know.
>>
>> I will wait for your answer before digging more the patch.
Hi Chanwoo,
[ ... ]
> Do you have any comment about this patch?
Yes, a similar patch has been posted for the tegra2 timer to run on
arm64. The patch in question put macros #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 to disable
some parts of the code. That ended, the tegra2 timer was not needed for
the moment because of the arch timer present, so it has been disabled
from the compilation until a proper fix without macros could be proposed.
It is happening exactly the same with this patch. As Kukjin pointed it,
the exynos_mct may not be needed (at least until a backup timer is
needed at PM time).
I suggest you look at a nicer way to fix that instead of introducing
macros (which is by the way valid but not recommended by the CodingStyle
rules) and perhaps sync with Paul and Thierry [cc'ed] to find a common
solution.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 5:33 [RESEND PATCH v3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Add the support for Exynos 64bit SoC Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-14 15:51 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-01-14 16:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-14 23:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-15 11:29 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-15 12:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-15 12:52 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-15 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 0:03 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-19 0:54 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-01-19 9:27 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-01-19 10:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BCCE16.8050607@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).