From: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com (Masami Hiramatsu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization.
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:12:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BDFFCD.4010500@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BDC55D.3090200@huawei.com>
(2015/01/20 12:02), Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2015/1/12 19:24, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2015/01/05 21:31), Wang Nan wrote:
>>> In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
>>>
>>> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>>
>>> This is because original code checks kprobes_all_disarmed in
>>> optimize_kprobe(), but this flag is turned off after calling that
>>> function. Therefore, optimize_kprobe() will see
>>> kprobes_all_disarmed == true and doesn't do the optimization.
>>
>> OK, a workaround is to disable/enable optimizing via sysctl.
>>
>>>
>>> This patch simply turns off kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable
>>> optimization.
>>>
>>
>> Anyway, thank you for finding that! :)
>>
>> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
>>
>
> Hi Masami Hiramatsu,
>
> What about this patch? Are you still thinking on it like
> '[PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: checks kprobes_all_disarmed in unoptimized_kprobe()' ?
Without this patch.
-----
[root at localhost tracing]# echo p do_fork+5 > kprobe_events
[root at localhost tracing]# echo 1 > events/kprobes/p_do_fork_5/enable
[root at localhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bd055 k do_fork+0x5 [OPTIMIZED]
[root at localhost tracing]# echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
[root at localhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bd055 k do_fork+0x5
[root at localhost tracing]# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
[root at localhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bd055 k do_fork+0x5
------
With this patch.
------
[root at localhost tracing]# echo p do_fork+5 > kprobe_events
[root at localhost tracing]# echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
[root at localhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bc1c5 k do_fork+0x5 [OPTIMIZED]
[root at localhost tracing]# echo 0 > ../kprobes/enabled
[root at localhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bc1c5 k do_fork+0x5
[root at localhost tracing]# echo 1 > ../kprobes/enabled
[root at localhost tracing]# cat ../kprobes/list
ffffffff810bc1c5 k do_fork+0x5 [OPTIMIZED]
------
So, looks OK to me too ;)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Ingo,
Could you also pull this patch to your -tip tree?
Thank you,
>
> Thank you.
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/kprobes.c | 7 ++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> index bad4e95..b185464 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> @@ -2320,6 +2320,12 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
>>> if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
>>> goto already_enabled;
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * optimize_kprobe() called by arm_kprobe() checks
>>> + * kprobes_all_disarmed, so set kprobes_all_disarmed before
>>> + * arm_kprobe.
>>> + */
>>> + kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
>>> /* Arming kprobes doesn't optimize kprobe itself */
>>> for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
>>> head = &kprobe_table[i];
>>> @@ -2328,7 +2334,6 @@ static void arm_all_kprobes(void)
>>> arm_kprobe(p);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
>>> printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally enabled\n");
>>>
>>> already_enabled:
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-05 12:31 [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: set kprobes_all_disarmed earlier to enable re-optimization Wang Nan
2015-01-12 11:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-01-20 3:02 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-20 7:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-02-19 0:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BDFFCD.4010500@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).