From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:38:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCHv7 2/2] arm64: add better page protections to arm64 In-Reply-To: <20150120184054.GJ25575@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1421276394-20402-1-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org> <1421276394-20402-3-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org> <54B9AC53.8020903@codeaurora.org> <20150120181453.GI25575@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150120184054.GJ25575@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <54BEAEAE.8010700@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 1/20/2015 10:40 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:19:23PM +0000, Kees Cook wrote: >> If, however, only the name is stopping it from landing in arm64, then >> I don't care what it's called. ;) > > Apart from couple of comments on this latest series, the patches look > fine to me. > Did that message get sent out? I don't see it in my inbox. > One question for Laura though: have the patches been tested it with: > > - 4-levels and 4KB pages? > - 3-levels and 64KB pages? > Yes, just re-verified once again that both 4 level 4K pages and 3 level 64K pages work with this series. Thanks, Laura -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project