From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: florian@openwrt.org (Florian Fainelli) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:22:25 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20 In-Reply-To: <20150123220111.GE20896@quad.lixom.net> References: <54BED7D7.80207@hauke-m.de> <20150123220111.GE20896@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <54C48BA1.9080902@openwrt.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd, >> >> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20. >> >> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672: >> >> Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817: >> >> ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100) > > Hi Hauke, > > I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below. > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20 >> >> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens > > No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is > enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than > "dts updates". Something to think about going forward. > > Also: > > We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from > here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and > every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok > with you? Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull requests, the rationale being that: - the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized pull requests - there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests through one maintainer). Thanks! -- Florian