From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:21:54 -0600 Subject: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI In-Reply-To: References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1421247905-3749-5-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150128181453.GG31752@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54C92804.5090806@codeaurora.org> <20150129151956.GF8951@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <54CA7A42.5080800@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/29/2015 12:20 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > If we are going with this solution, we should also mandate that an > ACPI enabled firmware should not supply a non-DT DTB What is a non-DT DTB? I thought the "DT" in "DTB" stood for device tree. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.