From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:48:21 -0600 Subject: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI In-Reply-To: <20150130111311.GA27542@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1421247905-3749-5-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150128181453.GG31752@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54C92804.5090806@codeaurora.org> <20150129151956.GF8951@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150130111311.GA27542@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <54CB99B5.7070505@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Catalin Marinas wrote: > Anyway, rather than a "I-created-an-empty-dtb" property, I would > actually say something like "dtb-contains-no-hardware-description". Why do we need a property for this? Wouldn't the absence of a hardware description be the best way to see if the dtb contains no hardware description? It's like putting a sign on an empty bookshelf that says, "there are no books here." -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.