From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:09:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: Use more descriptive names for Exynos5420 PDs In-Reply-To: <1423244258-24314-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> References: <1423244258-24314-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <54D51170.10903@cogentembedded.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 02/06/2015 08:37 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > All the device nodes for the Exynos5420 power-domains have a quite > generic "power-domain" name. And this is in conformance to the ePAPR standard. > So in case of an error, the Exynos PD > driver shows the following (not very useful) message: > "Power domain power-domain disable failed" Why not fix the message instead to use the full device name? > Use descriptive names to know on which PD enable or disable failed. > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas WBR, Sergei