From: mpeg.blue@free.fr (Mason)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:50:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D947B4.4080401@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D93FFA.3090506@codeaurora.org>
Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Mason wrote:
>
>> My platform provides a 32-bit counter, ticking at a constant 27 MHz.
>> Reading this counter has a latency of roughly 70 ns (it has to go
>> over the system memory bus). I think this is good enough for both
>> the clock source and sched_clock, is it not?
>>
>> So the plan would be:
>> - clocksource and sched_clock : 27 MHz, 32-bit counter, platform
>> - clockevents : TWD, standard
>
> Yep, that sounds like a good plan. If your platform has the ARM global
> timer (drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c) then you don't need
> anything besides that timer because it provides both the clocksource,
> sched_clock, and clockevents. Sounds like you don't have that timer
I'm using Cortex A9, so I do have the global timer (AFAIU).
However, I don't think I can safely use it as a clock source because
I'm also using cpufreq, and I don't think the arm_global_timer driver
handles CPU frequency updates, while the TWD driver does (?)
/*
* Updates clockevent frequency when the cpu frequency changes.
* Called on the cpu that is changing frequency with interrupts disabled.
*/
"The Interrupt Controller, global timer, private timers, and watchdogs
are clocked with PERIPHCLK." And PERIPHCLK is tied to CLK, which is
modified by cpufreq. I didn't see any code in the arm_global_timer
driver to deal with with that.
Did I overlook something fundamental?
> though, so you have to write a driver for your custom platform timer and
> at least hook up clocksource and sched_clock to it. If you have
> interrupts with your platform timer you can skip out on TWD and also
> register a clockevent in your platform timer driver.
Registering a clock source or a sched_clock seems straight-forward.
All I need to provide is a function to read the platform counter.
However, why would I skip out on TWD?
(I'm trying to minimize code needed for the port.)
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 13:16 Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc Mason
2015-01-29 13:57 ` Mason
2015-02-03 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 18:37 ` Mason
2015-02-06 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 21:03 ` Mason
2015-02-07 10:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-09 7:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-02-09 16:10 ` Sören Brinkmann
2015-02-09 23:27 ` Mason
2015-02-06 20:25 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 21:17 ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:31 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-07 2:21 ` Mason
2015-02-07 9:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-09 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 22:31 ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 23:50 ` Mason [this message]
2015-02-11 17:43 ` Mason
2015-02-11 18:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 21:58 ` Mason
2015-02-11 23:26 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D947B4.4080401@free.fr \
--to=mpeg.blue@free.fr \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).