[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Hauke Mehrtens]

Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,

This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.

The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:

  Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20

for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:

  ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20

Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Haab (1):
      ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Luxul XWC-1000

Rafa? Mi?ecki (3):
      ARM: BCM5301X: Drop unused poll-interval from gpio-keys
      ARM: BCM5301X: Add LEDs for Buffalo devices
      ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP

 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |  4 +++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-buffalo-wzr-1750dhp.dts  | 68
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts       | 60
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts        |  1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6300-v2.dts     |  1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-asus-rt-n18u.dts        |  1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-600dhp2.dts | 68
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-900dhp.dts  | 37
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-luxul-xwc-1000.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47081-buffalo-wzr-900dhp.dts

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Olof Johansson]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
> 
> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.
> 
> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:
> 
>   Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:
> 
>   ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)

Hi Hauke,

I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below.

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>

No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is
enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than
"dts updates". Something to think about going forward.

Also:

We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from
here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and
every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok
with you?


-Olof

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Florian Fainelli]

Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit :
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
>>
>> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:
>>
>>   Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:
>>
>>   ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)
> 
> Hi Hauke,
> 
> I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below.
> 
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
> 
> No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is
> enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than
> "dts updates". Something to think about going forward.
> 
> Also:
> 
> We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from
> here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and
> every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok
> with you?

Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually
agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull
requests, the rationale being that:

- the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our
development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want
to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized
pull requests

- there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you
would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions

That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you
prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests
through one maintainer).

Thanks!
--
Florian

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Florian Fainelli]

Le 24/01/2015 22:22, Florian Fainelli a ?crit :
> 
> 
> Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit :
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
>>>
>>> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:
>>>
>>>   Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>   https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:
>>>
>>>   ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)
>>
>> Hi Hauke,
>>
>> I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below.
>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>
>> No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is
>> enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than
>> "dts updates". Something to think about going forward.
>>
>> Also:
>>
>> We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from
>> here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and
>> every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok
>> with you?
> 
> Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually
> agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull
> requests, the rationale being that:
> 
> - the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our
> development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want
> to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized
> pull requests
> 
> - there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you
> would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions
> 
> That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you
> prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests
> through one maintainer).

I will get all the Broadcom changes routed through a single pull request
model, let me know if you want that to change in the future.
--
Florian

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Olof Johansson]

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 24/01/2015 22:22, Florian Fainelli a ?crit :
>>
>>
>> Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit :
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
>>>>
>>>> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:
>>>>
>>>>   Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:
>>>>
>>>>   ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)
>>>
>>> Hi Hauke,
>>>
>>> I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>>
>>> No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is
>>> enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than
>>> "dts updates". Something to think about going forward.
>>>
>>> Also:
>>>
>>> We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from
>>> here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and
>>> every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok
>>> with you?
>>
>> Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually
>> agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull
>> requests, the rationale being that:
>>
>> - the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our
>> development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want
>> to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized
>> pull requests
>>
>> - there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you
>> would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions
>>
>> That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you
>> prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests
>> through one maintainer).
>
> I will get all the Broadcom changes routed through a single pull request
> model, let me know if you want that to change in the future.

Sorry, forgot to reply earlier.

I think that would be preferred by us, yes.

Even though there's little code sharing, there's still the need to
train new maintainers on what we prefer and not, which we'd then push
one level further in the maintainer graph for better scaling. :)


-Olof

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 10 February 2015 at 11:17, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 24/01/2015 22:22, Florian Fainelli a ?crit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit :
>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>>> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>>   https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20
>>>>>
>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:
>>>>>
>>>>>   ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)
>>>>
>>>> Hi Hauke,
>>>>
>>>> I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>>>
>>>> No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is
>>>> enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than
>>>> "dts updates". Something to think about going forward.
>>>>
>>>> Also:
>>>>
>>>> We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from
>>>> here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and
>>>> every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok
>>>> with you?
>>>
>>> Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually
>>> agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull
>>> requests, the rationale being that:
>>>
>>> - the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our
>>> development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want
>>> to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized
>>> pull requests
>>>
>>> - there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you
>>> would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions
>>>
>>> That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you
>>> prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests
>>> through one maintainer).
>>
>> I will get all the Broadcom changes routed through a single pull request
>> model, let me know if you want that to change in the future.
>
> Sorry, forgot to reply earlier.
>
> I think that would be preferred by us, yes.
>
> Even though there's little code sharing, there's still the need to
> train new maintainers on what we prefer and not, which we'd then push
> one level further in the maintainer graph for better scaling. :)

Florian: will you handle these pull requests then? Can you share some
git tree we can track?

-- 
Rafa?

[GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20

[Florian Fainelli]

On 28/02/15 15:13, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> On 10 February 2015 at 11:17, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Le 24/01/2015 22:22, Florian Fainelli a ?crit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit :
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hauke,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
>>>>>
>>>>> No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is
>>>>> enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than
>>>>> "dts updates". Something to think about going forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also:
>>>>>
>>>>> We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from
>>>>> here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and
>>>>> every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok
>>>>> with you?
>>>>
>>>> Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually
>>>> agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull
>>>> requests, the rationale being that:
>>>>
>>>> - the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our
>>>> development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want
>>>> to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized
>>>> pull requests
>>>>
>>>> - there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you
>>>> would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions
>>>>
>>>> That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you
>>>> prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests
>>>> through one maintainer).
>>>
>>> I will get all the Broadcom changes routed through a single pull request
>>> model, let me know if you want that to change in the future.
>>
>> Sorry, forgot to reply earlier.
>>
>> I think that would be preferred by us, yes.
>>
>> Even though there's little code sharing, there's still the need to
>> train new maintainers on what we prefer and not, which we'd then push
>> one level further in the maintainer graph for better scaling. :)
> 
> Florian: will you handle these pull requests then? Can you share some
> git tree we can track?

I am queueing DTS changes at github.com/Broadcom/stblinux in the
devicetree/next branch, thanks!
-- 
Florian