From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rjui@broadcom.com (Ray Jui)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:10:23 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/3] i2c: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc I2C Driver
In-Reply-To: <20150210083339.GA999@katana>
References: <rjui@broadcom.com>
 <1423373126-30024-1-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com>
 <1423373126-30024-3-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com>
 <20150209121036.GB2491@katana> <54D995DA.7040201@broadcom.com>
 <20150210083339.GA999@katana>
Message-ID: <54DA3B7F.8040705@broadcom.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On 2/10/2015 12:33 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> Thanks, Wolfram. I think I'm missing something here and would like to
>> get it clarified, so I don't make the same mistake again in the future:
>> I thought I've already sent these patches as a new thread, i.e., [PATCH
>> v9 ...], isn't it?
> 
> Yes, but "In-Reply-To" was set and so my MUAs (mutt and Thunderbird)
> threaded them to your first submission. Most people I know prefer to
> have this not threaded.
> 
Okay I got it now. Thanks.

Ray