From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:33:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DA4F17.2040705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150210154157.GL8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 02/10/15 07:41, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 05:24:08PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>
>> Maybe we can do the same thing here by using a
>> spinlock for synchronization between the IPI handler and the dying CPU?
>> So lock/unlock around the IPI sending from the dying CPU and then do a
>> lock/unlock on the killing CPU before continuing.
> It would be nice, but it means exporting irq_controller_lock from irq_gic.c.
> It's doable, but it's really not nice - it creates a layering issue, buy
> making arch/arm/kernel/smp.c depend on symbols exported from
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c.
I wasn't talking about the irq_controller_lock. I was saying we should
add another spinlock for synchronization purposes in arm/kernel/smp.c
---8<----
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index 02c5da16c7ed..fe0386c751b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
}
static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(stop_lock);
/*
* called on the thread which is asking for a CPU to be shutdown -
@@ -232,10 +233,13 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
*/
void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_died, msecs_to_jiffies(5000))) {
pr_err("CPU%u: cpu didn't die\n", cpu);
return;
}
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&stop_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stop_lock, flags);
pr_notice("CPU%u: shutdown\n", cpu);
/*
@@ -280,7 +284,17 @@ void __ref cpu_die(void)
* has been sent, power and/or clocks can be removed at any point
* from this CPU and its cache by platform_cpu_kill().
*/
+ raw_spin_lock(&stop_lock);
__smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask)), IPI_CPU_DEAD);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&stop_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that the cache lines associated with the stop_lock are
+ * written out. This covers the case where _this_ CPU is doing the
+ * powering down, to ensure that the lock is visible to the
+ * CPU waiting for this one.
+ */
+ flush_cache_louis();
/*
* The actual CPU shutdown procedure is@least platform (if not
@@ -517,8 +531,6 @@ void tick_broadcast(const struct cpumask *mask)
}
#endif
-static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(stop_lock);
-
/*
* ipi_cpu_stop - handle IPI from smp_send_stop()
*/
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 10:14 [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:28 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 14:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 17:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 1:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 1:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 2:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 3:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 20:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 21:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 15:52 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 16:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 17:21 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 17:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 16:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 15:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 20:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 15:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 18:33 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-02-25 12:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 17:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 18:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 20:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-26 1:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-22 23:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 12:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 13:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 14:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-26 19:14 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-02-26 19:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-05 10:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 10:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54DA4F17.2040705@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).