linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:01:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DE9067.70103@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150213230137.GH8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 02/13/15 15:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:44:50PM +0000, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> Also, based on the comment in mcpm_cpu_can_disable() it looks like the
>> PSCI hook may be executed once only with your change in place?
>> Hopefully PSCI is OK not being invoked for every CPU shutdown.
> This is why I've said (in the parent thread) that I'm not happy to
> apply this patch.  Mark Rutland has indicated that he has MCPM cases
> where the CPUs which can be disabled changes dynamically according
> to the secure firmware requirements, and ripping out todays
> infrastructure in light of that, only to have to add it back again
> later makes no sense.

Putting it back is not hard. And the infrastructure is not currently
used for these purposes so renaming it is appropriate. I can leave it in
place if you like, i.e. make a new op for cpu_can_disable and repoint
mcpm's mcpm_cpu_disable() at it. Then when mcpm gets migrate support it
can actually implement a cpu_disable op.

>
> However, cleaning things up by removing unnecessary cpu_disable
> methods is a good thing to do irrespective of that.
>

That's fine I can split it out.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-14  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-13 18:06 [PATCH v2] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 20:20 ` Simon Horman
2015-02-13 20:23   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 20:54     ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-13 20:59       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 21:44         ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-13 23:01           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-14  0:01             ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-02-14 10:01             ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-16 15:29             ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 22:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 22:57   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 23:24     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54DE9067.70103@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).