From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: josh.wu@atmel.com (Josh Wu) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:54:26 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] media: ov2640: add primary dt support In-Reply-To: References: <1423560696-12304-1-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> <1423560696-12304-4-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com> Message-ID: <54ED4772.902@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Prabhakar Lad On 2/17/2015 12:48 AM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Thanks for the patch. > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Josh Wu wrote: > [Snip] >> - priv->clk = v4l2_clk_get(&client->dev, "mclk"); >> + priv->clk = v4l2_clk_get(&client->dev, "xvclk"); > with this change don?t you need to update the board file using this driver/ > the bridge driver ? I think no. First, my patch should be on top of the following two patches, which changed the *v4l2_clk_get()* behavior: [v3,1/2] V4L: remove clock name from v4l2_clk API https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/28108/ [v4,2/2] V4L: add CCF support to the v4l2_clk API https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/28111/ After applied above two patches, v4l2_clk_get() function is changed. The name "mclk" is refer to a CCF clock of the ov2640 device. If not found such a "mclk" CCF clock, v4l2_clk_get() will try to get the internal register clock in soc_camera.c. As the CCF dt clock is not support by ov2640 until I add DT support, that means current ov2640 driver will always not found the "mclk" CCF clock, and they will use internal clock. So after I changed the name "mclk" to "xvclk", the default behavior will not change (still using internal clock registered by soc-camera.c). Best Regards, Josh Wu > > Regards, > --Prabhakar Lad