From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:45:50 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: BCM5301X: DT changes for v3.20 In-Reply-To: References: <54BED7D7.80207@hauke-m.de> <20150123220111.GE20896@quad.lixom.net> <54C48BA1.9080902@openwrt.org> <54D99A62.6010508@gmail.com> Message-ID: <54F4F62E.3040306@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28/02/15 15:13, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 11:17, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> Le 24/01/2015 22:22, Florian Fainelli a ?crit : >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 23/01/2015 14:01, Olof Johansson a ?crit : >>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:33:59PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >>>>>> Hi Olof, Hi Arnd, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a pull request with some dt updates for BCM5301X for 3.20. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following changes since commit 97bf6af1f928216fd6c5a66e8a57bfa95a659672: >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux 3.19-rc1 (2014-12-20 17:08:50 -0800) >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/hauke/linux.git tags/bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20 >>>>>> >>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 5b1864b899d2b591402704dd0f6528c8661f1817: >>>>>> >>>>>> ARM: BCM5301X: Add DT for Buffalo WZR-900DHP (2015-01-20 23:23:25 +0100) >>>>> >>>>> Hi Hauke, >>>>> >>>>> I've merged this into next/dt now, comments below. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> bcm5301x-dt-2015-01-20: ARM: BCM5301X: dts updates for 3.20 >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens >>>>> >>>>> No signed-off-by needed in the tag -- the fact that you have signed it is >>>>> enough. We do ask for a few words about what's in the branch though more than >>>>> "dts updates". Something to think about going forward. >>>>> >>>>> Also: >>>>> >>>>> We had asked that broadcom platforms go in together through Florian from >>>>> here on out, so we don't have to deal with merge requests from each and >>>>> every one of you since there are several subplatforms. Would that be ok >>>>> with you? >>>> >>>> Humm, I had asked you and Arnd a couple times if you would actually >>>> agree in us (bcm5301x, cygnus, brcmstb and others) doing separate pull >>>> requests, the rationale being that: >>>> >>>> - the previous mach-bcm maintainers had been holding some of our >>>> development because of their lack of responsiveness, so we did not want >>>> to end-up creating the same (potential) situation here with centralized >>>> pull requests >>>> >>>> - there is little to no code sharing happening within mach-bcm, so you >>>> would typically only have to merge the Makefile and Kconfig portions >>>> >>>> That said, I still have no problems sending grouped pull requests if you >>>> prefer this model (that is sending all broadcom related pull requests >>>> through one maintainer). >>> >>> I will get all the Broadcom changes routed through a single pull request >>> model, let me know if you want that to change in the future. >> >> Sorry, forgot to reply earlier. >> >> I think that would be preferred by us, yes. >> >> Even though there's little code sharing, there's still the need to >> train new maintainers on what we prefer and not, which we'd then push >> one level further in the maintainer graph for better scaling. :) > > Florian: will you handle these pull requests then? Can you share some > git tree we can track? I am queueing DTS changes at github.com/Broadcom/stblinux in the devicetree/next branch, thanks! -- Florian