From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: mvebu: Fix the CPU PM notifier usage
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:30:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F58D2F.2010907@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F03B51.1010708@free-electrons.com>
On 02/27/2015 10:39 AM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 26/02/2015 22:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 06:20:48 PM Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>> As stated in kernel/cpu_pm.c, "Platform is responsible for ensuring
>>> that cpu_pm_enter is not called twice on the same CPU before
>>> cpu_pm_exit is called.". In the current code in case of failure when
>>> calling mvebu_v7_cpu_suspend, the function cpu_pm_exit() is never
>>> called whereas cpu_pm_enter() was called just before.
>>>
>>> This patch moves the cpu_pm_exit() in order to balance the
>>> cpu_pm_enter() calls.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Fulvio Benini <fbf@libero.it>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
>>
>> Should that go to "stable" too? Which "stable" series it should go to if so?
>
> Yes as it fixes a potential issue, you're right it should go
> to "stable". The bug was here since the introduction of the driver
> in 3.16.
Hi Gregory,
actually the 'stable' rules state clearly:
"- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing)."
You say "it fixes a potential issue", so no bug has been raise yet, right ?
>>> ---
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c
>>> index 38e68618513a..cefa07438ae1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-mvebu-v7.c
>>> @@ -37,11 +37,11 @@ static int mvebu_v7_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>> deepidle = true;
>>>
>>> ret = mvebu_v7_cpu_suspend(deepidle);
>>> + cpu_pm_exit();
>>> +
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> - cpu_pm_exit();
>>> -
>>> return index;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 17:20 [PATCH] cpuidle: mvebu: Fix the CPU PM notifier usage Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-26 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-27 9:39 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-03-03 10:30 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-03-03 10:34 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-03-03 10:52 ` Fulvio
2015-03-03 11:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:51 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-03-03 13:00 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 14:58 ` Fulvio
2015-03-03 15:20 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-04 14:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 14:34 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-27 16:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-02-27 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F58D2F.2010907@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).