From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:28:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed
 to reflect behaviour
In-Reply-To: <1634669.Cj7rnHN4gq@avalon>
References: <1421488012-5098-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
 <54C56582.6080809@linaro.org> <1634669.Cj7rnHN4gq@avalon>
Message-ID: <54F59AE6.6010303@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/01/2015 02:00 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sunday 25 January 2015 22:52:02 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 01/17/2015 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't
>>> need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed
>>> already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT.
>>>
>>> Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return value
>>> to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>>
>> I would like to have an ack from Sudeep or Mark (Cc'ed) before taking
>> this patch.
>
> Sudeep, Mark, ping ?

Last call :)

>>> ---
>>>
>>>    drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 13 +++++++------
>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index 095c1774592c..3cbdd563a967
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -660,17 +660,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>>> arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
>>>   };
>>>   static bool __init
>>> -arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
>>> +arch_timer_need_probe(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
>>>   {
>>>    	struct device_node *dn;
>>> -	bool probed = true;
>>> +	bool need_probe = false;
>>>
>>>    	dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
>>>    	if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && !(arch_timers_present &
>>>    	type))
>>> -		probed = false;
>>> +		need_probe = true;
>>>
>>>    	of_node_put(dn);
>>>
>>> -	return probed;
>>> +	return need_probe;
>>>    }
>>>
>>>    static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
>>> @@ -679,9 +679,10 @@ static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
>>>    	/* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
>>>    	if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
>>> -		if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
>>> +		if (arch_timer_need_probe(ARCH_MEM_TIMER,
>>> +					  arch_timer_mem_of_match))
>>>    			return;
>>> -		if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
>>> +		if (arch_timer_need_probe(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
>>>    			return;
>>>    	}
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog