From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:34:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed
 to reflect behaviour
In-Reply-To: <54F59AE6.6010303@linaro.org>
References: <1421488012-5098-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
 <54C56582.6080809@linaro.org> <1634669.Cj7rnHN4gq@avalon>
 <54F59AE6.6010303@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <54F59C28.3000203@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/03/15 11:28, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/01/2015 02:00 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sunday 25 January 2015 22:52:02 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2015 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't
>>>> need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed
>>>> already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT.
>>>>
>>>> Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return value
>>>> to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
>>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>>>
>>> I would like to have an ack from Sudeep or Mark (Cc'ed) before taking
>>> this patch.
>>
>> Sudeep, Mark, ping ?
> 
> Last call :)

By Mark, I assume you mean Mark Rutland (which is oddly not CC-ed).

Adding him.

	M.

>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 13 +++++++------
>>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>>> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index 095c1774592c..3cbdd563a967
>>>> 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>>> @@ -660,17 +660,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>>>> arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
>>>>   };
>>>>   static bool __init
>>>> -arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
>>>> +arch_timer_need_probe(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
>>>>   {
>>>>    	struct device_node *dn;
>>>> -	bool probed = true;
>>>> +	bool need_probe = false;
>>>>
>>>>    	dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
>>>>    	if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && !(arch_timers_present &
>>>>    	type))
>>>> -		probed = false;
>>>> +		need_probe = true;
>>>>
>>>>    	of_node_put(dn);
>>>>
>>>> -	return probed;
>>>> +	return need_probe;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
>>>> @@ -679,9 +679,10 @@ static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
>>>>    	/* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
>>>>    	if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
>>>> -		if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
>>>> +		if (arch_timer_need_probe(ARCH_MEM_TIMER,
>>>> +					  arch_timer_mem_of_match))
>>>>    			return;
>>>> -		if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
>>>> +		if (arch_timer_need_probe(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
>>>>    			return;
>>>>    	}
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...