From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:56:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour In-Reply-To: <1634669.Cj7rnHN4gq@avalon> References: <1421488012-5098-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <54C56582.6080809@linaro.org> <1634669.Cj7rnHN4gq@avalon> Message-ID: <54F5A165.4010408@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/03/15 13:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > On Sunday 25 January 2015 22:52:02 Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 01/17/2015 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't >>> need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed >>> already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT. >>> >>> Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return value >>> to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart >>> >> >> I would like to have an ack from Sudeep or Mark (Cc'ed) before taking >> this patch. > > Sudeep, Mark, ping ? > Looks fine to me. I just wanted to test on KVM which I had broke once previously though this change is pretty straight forward and simple. Acked-by: Sudeep Holla Regards, Sudeep