From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:41:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Rename arch_timer_probed to reflect behaviour In-Reply-To: <54F5A165.4010408@arm.com> References: <1421488012-5098-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <54C56582.6080809@linaro.org> <1634669.Cj7rnHN4gq@avalon> <54F5A165.4010408@arm.com> Message-ID: <54F5D60F.9040602@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/03/2015 12:56 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 01/03/15 13:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Sunday 25 January 2015 22:52:02 Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> On 01/17/2015 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> The arch_timer_probed function returns whether the given time doesn't >>>> need to be probed. This can be the case when the timer has been probed >>>> already, but also when it has no corresponding enabled node in DT. >>>> >>>> Rename the function to arch_timer_need_probe and invert its return >>>> value >>>> to better reflect the function's purpose and behaviour. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart >>>> >>> >>> I would like to have an ack from Sudeep or Mark (Cc'ed) before taking >>> this patch. >> >> Sudeep, Mark, ping ? >> > > Looks fine to me. I just wanted to test on KVM which I had broke once > previously though this change is pretty straight forward and simple. > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla I applied the patch for 4.1. Thanks ! -- Daniel -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog