From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:42:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F9140B.3060109@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150305185407.GK14093@leverpostej>
Hi,
On 03/06/2015 03:54 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>>>> + psci {
>>>>>> + compatible = "arm,psci";
>>>>>> + method = "smc";
>>>>>> + cpu_off = <0x84000002>;
>>>>>> + cpu_on = <0xC4000003>;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>
>>>>> Back at v2 you mentioned that CPU_OFF wasn't working [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Do both CPU_ON and CPU_OFF work for all CPUs, including the boot CPU?
>>>>
>>>> The CPU1 ~ CPU7 are well woking about CPU_ON/OFF.
>>>> CPU0 (boot CPU) is only well working for CPU_OFF.
>>>> But when I try to turn on the CPU0 after CPU_OFF, I failed it.
>>>
>>> That's rather worrying. Can you look into what's going on here? I'd
>>> rather not have dts describing things which are known to be broken.
>>
>> The board dts don't include any node for CPU_ON/OFF.
>
> I don't understand. The CPU_ON and CPU_OFF IDs are in the psci node
> quoted above, and all the CPUs had enable-method = "psci".
I mean that there are not additional dt node except for 'cpu' and 'psci' node.
>
>> When I try to turn on the CPU0 (boot CPU), fail to turn on and lockup happen.
>> After lockup happen, I cannot use the console.
>
> That sounds like a pretty major bug.
>
> Are you able to investigate with a hardware debugger?
I can't do because there are not any jtag connector.
>
> Do other CPUs eventually log errors regarding the lockup? Or is the
> machine completely dead from this point on?
I tested CPU0 on/off. When I turn on the CPU0, I fail it. But, kernel just show the error log without lockup.
I gave you wrong infromation about CPU0 off.
[test result of CPU0 on/off on Linux 4.0-rc2]
root at localhost:~# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
[ 420.965435] IRQ1 no longer affine to CPU0
[ 420.965439] IRQ2 no longer affine to CPU0
[ 4631.194227] CPU0: shutdown
root at localhost:~# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
[ 1164.601644] CPU0: failed to come online
-bash: echo: write error: Input/output error
As I experienced, Exynos SoC could not turn off the CPU0 (boot cpu).
I think that we may need the hidden information of Exynos5433 from Exynos5433 architector.
>
>>>>> I take it CPUs boot at EL2?
>>>
>>> Do the CPUs boot at EL1 or EL2?
>>
>> Unfortunately, I cannot check the secure firmware for Exynos5433 SoC.
>> I think that a few SoC provider probably would know it.
>
> I guess I asked the wrong question.
>
> Do CPUs enter the kernel at EL2 or at EL1?
Could you give me a tip how to check the kernel at EL2 or EL1?
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-05 5:38 [PATCH v5 0/9] arm64: Add the support for new Exynos5433 SoC Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for 64-bit " Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 12:24 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-05 16:12 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 17:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-05 17:36 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 18:54 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-06 2:42 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2015-03-06 11:40 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-06 12:18 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-10 1:31 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-12 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add MSHC dt node for Exynos5433 Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SPI/PDMA " Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add PMU " Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add RTC and ADC dt node for Exynos5433 SoC Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add ADMA " Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add I2S " Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add TMU sensor " Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-05 5:38 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add thermal-zones " Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F9140B.3060109@samsung.com \
--to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).