From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: at91: remove SoC headers
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5501948F.9000509@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150304171505.GH3989@piout.net>
Le 04/03/2015 18:15, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit :
> On 04/03/2015 at 18:03:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 15:47:25 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,14 @@
>>> #include "generic.h"
>>> #include "soc.h"
>>>
>>> +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_USART3 0xfc00c000 /* (USART3 non-secure) Base Address */
>>> +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_PMC 0xf0018000 /* (PMC) Base Address */
>>> +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_MPDDRC 0xf0010000 /* (MPDDRC) Base Address */
>>> +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_PIOD 0xfc068000 /* (PIOD) Base Address */
>>> +
>>> +/* Some other peripherals */
>>> +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_SYS2 SAMA5D4_BASE_PIOD
>>>
>>
>> Why are these still needed? I would expect that the code using them
>> can be removed as well.
>>
>
> Yeah, that is still something I need to investigate. Nicolas told me it
> doesn't work without it. My guess is that it has something to do with
> secure booting.
These io mapping were from the time when we did have all the recently
developed drivers (RAM, PMC, SoC detection).
As you tested lately, it now works without them.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-12 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 14:47 [PATCH 0/6] Switch mach-at91 to multiplatform Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: at91: switch " Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 23:21 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-04 23:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 23:43 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: at91: switch at91_dt_defconfig " Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: at91: remove unused headers Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: at91: remove useless mach/cpu.h Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: at91: remove SoC headers Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 17:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-04 17:15 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-04 19:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-12 13:28 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-03-04 14:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: at91: remove hardware.h Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5501948F.9000509@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).