From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:19:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5502C7C8.1020002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426242563.18291.19.camel@mtksdaap41>
On 13/03/15 11:29, Eddie Huang wrote:
>
> I encounter some trouble when I add code to check return value of
> regmap_read and regmap_write. Every RTC register access through regmap,
> and there are many register read/write in this driver. If I check every
> return value, the driver will become ugly. I try to make this driver
> clean using following macro.
>
> static int __rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 *data)
> {
> u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
>
> if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> return regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
>
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> #define rtc_read(ret, rtc, offset, data) \
> ({ \
> ret = __rtc_read(rtc, offset, data); \
> if (ret < 0) \
> goto rtc_exit; \
> }) \
>
I agree with Sascha on hiding a goto statement in a macro is not a good idea.
>
> And function call rtc_read, rtc_write looks like:
>
> static int mtk_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> {
> unsigned long time;
> struct mt6397_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret = 0;
> u32 sec;
>
> mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
> do {
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &tm->tm_sec);
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MIN, &tm->tm_min);
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_HOU, &tm->tm_hour);
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_DOM, &tm->tm_mday);
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MTH, &tm->tm_mon);
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_YEA, &tm->tm_year);
> rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &sec);
> } while (sec < tm->tm_sec);
What about introducing
static int __mtk_rtc_read_time(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm, u32 *sec)
and hide the checks of return values from regmap_read and the offset check in there. You return the error code or 0.
This way the while loop would look like this:
do {
ret = __mtk_rtc_read_time(rtc, &tm, &sec);
if (ret < 0)
goto rtc_exit;
} while (sec < tm->tm_sec);
Best regards,
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 9:27 [PATCH 0/2] Add Mediatek RTC driver Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: Add Mediatek RTC driver binding document Eddie Huang
2015-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver Eddie Huang
2015-02-23 21:50 ` [rtc-linux] " Andrew Morton
2015-03-02 8:20 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-02 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-13 10:29 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 10:57 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-16 9:52 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 11:19 ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2015-03-16 15:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-17 12:31 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-17 13:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-18 3:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-18 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5502C7C8.1020002@gmail.com \
--to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).