From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:26:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach
In-Reply-To: <20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
<5501A1DE.9020804@linaro.org>
<20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <55035623.8010002@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org
On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> do you agree with this patchset ?
>
> In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for
> Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your
> tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks.
If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there is
a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor
to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom.
Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchset
to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believe
the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also.
--
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook |
Twitter |
Blog