From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] Fix backtrace support in THUMB2 mode
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:31:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5507361.VIWsBiqp2f@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401469191-29232-1-git-send-email-nikolay.borisov@arm.com>
On Friday 30 May 2014 17:59:44 Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> From: Nikolay Borisov <Nikolay.Borisov@arm.com>
>
> Currently all the code which deals with backtrace support assumes that R11
> is the frame-pointer. While this is the case for ARM mode and is explicitly
> documented in the AAPCS, this is not the case for THUMB2 mode.
>
> There is no official document requiring that R11 has to be the frame pointer
> and GCC uses R7 as FP and given that R7's usage is so intertwined within GCC's
> mechanics it is unlikely to change, so fixing backtrace in THUMB2 mode seems
> in order.
>
> This patch series rectifies the problem by first fixing the
> thread_save_fp macro to reference the correct register. Furthermore, there
> a lot of repetetive sequences of code such as :
>
> stackframe.fp = pt_regs->ARM_fp
> stackframe.lr = pt_regs->ARM_lr
>
> so introducing a function arm_get_current_stack_frame which both
> hides this repetition and also utilizes teh frame_pointer(regs) macro
> to reference the correct register depending on the mode.
>
> Finally, change all the call sites so that they utilize the new routine.
Sorry for the stupid question, but does your series relate to the
#warning "TODO: return_address should use unwind tables" that we see
all the time in arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c?
If I remember the story correctly, the problem is that so far we could
never use the frame pointer in thumb2 mode, and nobody has implemented
a version of that function using the arm unwinder.
Are we now able to use the frame pointer after all?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-31 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-30 16:59 [PATCH v2 0/7] Fix backtrace support in THUMB2 mode Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ARM: Make thread_save_fp macro aware of " Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: Introduce arm_get_current_stack_frame() Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 17:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-06-02 8:05 ` Robert Richter
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ARM: perf: Make perf use arm_get_current_stackframe Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: time: Make use of arm_get_current_stackframe Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: unwind: Use arm_get_current_stackframe Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: traps: Make use of the frame_pointer macro Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: oprofile: Use of arm_get_current_stackframe Nikolay Borisov
2014-05-30 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Fix backtrace support in THUMB2 mode Will Deacon
2014-05-31 18:31 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-06-02 8:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5507361.VIWsBiqp2f@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox