From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:08:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55077E9D.50103@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5704037.pUGdJ0Q9hF@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015?03?14? 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>> index 074e52b..e8728d7 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config IA64
>>>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
>>>> select PCI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>>> select ACPI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI
>>>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
>>>> select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>>>> select HAVE_IDE
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> index b7d31ca..9804431 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config X86_64
>>>> ### Arch settings
>>>> config X86
>>>> def_bool y
>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI
>>> One more nit. If you did
>>>
>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI_SLEEP
>>>
>>> here (and above for ia64), you'd avoid having to make ACPI_SLEEP
>>> depend on ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP which goes somewhat backwards.
>> In sleep.c,
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
>> acpi_target_system_state()
>> {
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> and CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION,
>> which one of them will be enabled on ARM64 so ACPI_SLEEP
>> will also enabled too.
>>
>> So if we
>>
>> +select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI_SLEEP
>>
>> and
>>
>> +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP) += sleep.o
>>
>> it will lead to errors for acpi_target_system_state() that
>> is declared but not defined, so I will keep the code as
>> it is, what do you think?
> No, we need to hash this out. Having two different Kconfig options meaning
> almost the same thing (ACPI_SLEEP and ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP) is beyond ugly.
>
> Do you need ACPI_SLEEP on ARM64 at all?
No, at least for now we don't need it, the spec for sleep is not ready for
ARM64 arch, so ACPI_SLEEP will not work at all on ARM64.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 8:14 [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP Hanjun Guo
2015-03-13 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-16 12:14 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-16 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 1:08 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-03-17 2:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 2:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 3:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-17 4:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 5:59 ` Jon Masters
2015-03-17 6:31 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 14:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-18 1:56 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-03-17 12:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 14:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55077E9D.50103@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).