From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:23:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55097C46.9010605@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150318123012.GA3580@katana>
On 18.03.2015 13:30, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:21:05PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> I2C mux pinctrl driver currently determines the number of sub-busses by
>> counting available pinctrl-names. Unfortunately, this requires each
>> incarnation of the devicetree node with different available sub-busses
>> to be rewritten.
>>
>> This patch reworks i2c-mux-pinctrl driver to count the number of
>> available sub-nodes instead. The rework should be compatible to the old
>> way of probing for sub-busses and additionally allows to disable unused
>> sub-busses with standard DT property status = "disabled".
>
> Not sure about this change. With DYNAMIC_OF these days, you can't rely
> that 'disabled' stays disabled all the time. My gut feeling tells me
> that people will want to use this someday.
Possible. But this change just makes i2c-mux-pinctrl honor status
property at all. There is no functional change except it now allows
you to disable any of the sub-busses.
I agree that this driver still does not cope well with DYNAMIC_OF but
neither did the former implementation. How about we settle this driver
to this implementation now and wait for any maniac that wants to use it
the way you are suggesting above?
The other option would be to leave the driver as is - but at least on
Dove where the muxing-options are not used often, it will always create
4 i2c-busses (controller plus the three muxing options) on any board
even though the pins are not accessible at all. I think that will just
create massive confusion from the user point-of-view?
BTW, I have received a patchwork update notification - it may be
unrelated but I prefer the Dove dts/dtsi changes to go through mvebu
tree.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 18:52 [PATCH 0/8] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 20:46 ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-17 21:08 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 21:15 ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-17 21:19 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-26 21:46 ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-17 19:37 ` Rob Herring
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: dove: Fix uart[23] reg property Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:54 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: dts: dove: Always include gpio and interrupt-controller headers Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:54 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add node labels for PCIe ports 0 and 1 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:55 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add some more common pinctrl settings Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 14:56 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-23 15:07 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-17 18:52 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-26 17:55 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Gregory CLEMENT
2015-02-26 19:39 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-26 20:01 ` Stephen Warren
2015-02-26 20:35 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-02 20:01 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-04 9:10 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-09 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-10 16:28 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-16 20:15 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-18 12:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-18 13:23 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2015-03-18 14:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-18 23:10 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-19 10:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 10:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 15:47 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-19 16:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 16:49 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-19 20:52 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-20 10:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-21 21:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-22 13:03 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-03-23 18:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-27 21:08 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-04-03 18:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-27 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-02-27 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510 Sebastian Hesselbarth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55097C46.9010605@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).