From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:42:32 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming In-Reply-To: <1426706645-19313-1-git-send-email-sbranden@broadcom.com> References: <1426706645-19313-1-git-send-email-sbranden@broadcom.com> Message-ID: <5509D528.1080208@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote: > This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings > documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm. > > Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name > the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by > some of the other vendors. Conceptually I'm fine with this. Acked-by: Stephen Warren The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings, e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in those references need fixing up?