From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:44:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V2 7/8] ARM: cpuidle: Register per cpuidle device In-Reply-To: <20150319113824.GC4449@red-moon> References: <1426704372-20406-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1426704372-20406-8-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20150319110806.GE24556@red-moon> <550AB298.6040907@linaro.org> <20150319113824.GC4449@red-moon> Message-ID: <550AB69B.8000100@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/19/2015 12:38 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:27:20AM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > [...] > >>>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { >>>> ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); >>>> + >>>> + /* This cpu does not support any idle states */ >>>> + if (ret == -ENOSYS) >>>> + continue; >>>> + >>>> if (ret) { >>>> pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu); >>>> - return ret; >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); >>>> + if (!dev) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n"); >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + dev->cpu = cpu; >>>> + per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu) = dev; >>>> + >>>> + ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev); >>>> + if (ret) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n", >>>> + cpu); >>>> + kfree(dev); >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> +out: >>>> + return ret; >>> >>> return 0; >>> >>>> >>>> - return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL); >>>> +out_fail: >>>> + for (cpu--; cpu <= 0; cpu--) { >>> >>> This loop is wrong. >> >> Why is it wrong ? We have to initialize at cpu - 1 to unregister the >> previous registered cpu, not the current one, no ? > > Yes, but on cpu>=0 not cpu<=0 > > while (--cpu >= 0) Ah, yes. Thanks for spotting this. -- Daniel -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog