From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:44:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH V2 7/8] ARM: cpuidle: Register per cpuidle device
In-Reply-To: <20150319113824.GC4449@red-moon>
References: <1426704372-20406-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
<1426704372-20406-8-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
<20150319110806.GE24556@red-moon> <550AB298.6040907@linaro.org>
<20150319113824.GC4449@red-moon>
Message-ID: <550AB69B.8000100@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org
On 03/19/2015 12:38 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:27:20AM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>>> ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* This cpu does not support any idle states */
>>>> + if (ret == -ENOSYS)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu);
>>>> - return ret;
>>>> + goto out_fail;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!dev) {
>>>> + pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n");
>>>> + goto out_fail;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev->cpu = cpu;
>>>> + per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu) = dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n",
>>>> + cpu);
>>>> + kfree(dev);
>>>> + goto out_fail;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> +out:
>>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>>>
>>>> - return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL);
>>>> +out_fail:
>>>> + for (cpu--; cpu <= 0; cpu--) {
>>>
>>> This loop is wrong.
>>
>> Why is it wrong ? We have to initialize at cpu - 1 to unregister the
>> previous registered cpu, not the current one, no ?
>
> Yes, but on cpu>=0 not cpu<=0
>
> while (--cpu >= 0)
Ah, yes. Thanks for spotting this.
-- Daniel
--
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook |
Twitter |
Blog