From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:11:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V2 7/8] ARM: cpuidle: Register per cpuidle device In-Reply-To: <20150319154247.GB589@linaro.org> References: <1426704372-20406-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1426704372-20406-8-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <20150319153112.GA589@linaro.org> <550AEC3C.5090200@linaro.org> <20150319154247.GB589@linaro.org> Message-ID: <550B0339.6010609@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/19/2015 04:42 PM, Lina Iyer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19 2015 at 09:33 -0600, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 03/19/2015 04:31 PM, Lina Iyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 18 2015 at 12:46 -0600, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> Some architectures have some cpus which does not support idle states. >>>> >>>> Let the underlying low level code to return -ENOSYS when it is not >>>> possible to set an idle state. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >>>> --- >>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c | 45 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c >>>> b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c >>>> index 1c94b88..0682ed0 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c >>>> @@ -17,11 +17,14 @@ >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> +#include >>>> >>>> #include >>>> >>>> #include "dt_idle_states.h" >>>> >>>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, *cpuidle_arm_dev); >>> >>> Is a per-cpu variable needed? There seems to be no per-cpu access, other >>> than at init. >> >> :) >> >> Actually it is the cpuidle framework which is using the per cpu variable. >> > > But this is static pointer, I can see that struct cpuidle_device * being > used by cpuidle framework. > > It gets stored here? > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device *, cpuidle_devices); > > But we dont need to save it here, for in this file, there is no per-cpu > access, other than when the registration fails. Indeed, that is true. There is no need of these cpuidle variables. Furthermore, we can access the cpuidle_devices directly as they are exported in cpuidle.h. I will fix it. Thanks -- Daniel >>>> + >>>> /* >>>> * arm_enter_idle_state - Programs CPU to enter the specified state >>>> * >>>> @@ -94,6 +97,7 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void) >>>> { >>>> int cpu, ret; >>>> struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &arm_idle_driver; >>>> + struct cpuidle_device *dev; >>>> >>>> /* >>>> * Initialize idle states data, starting at index 1. >>>> @@ -105,18 +109,55 @@ static int __init arm_idle_init(void) >>>> if (ret <= 0) >>>> return ret ? : -ENODEV; >>>> >>>> + ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv); >>>> + if (ret) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle driver\n"); >>>> + return ret; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> /* >>>> * Call arch CPU operations in order to initialize >>>> * idle states suspend back-end specific data >>>> */ >>>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { >>>> ret = arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); >>>> + >>>> + /* This cpu does not support any idle states */ >>>> + if (ret == -ENOSYS) >>>> + continue; >>>> + >>>> if (ret) { >>>> pr_err("CPU %d failed to init idle CPU ops\n", cpu); >>>> - return ret; >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); >>>> + if (!dev) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to allocate cpuidle device\n"); >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + dev->cpu = cpu; >>>> + per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu) = dev; >>>> + >>>> + ret = cpuidle_register_device(dev); >>>> + if (ret) { >>>> + pr_err("Failed to register cpuidle device for CPU %d\n", >>>> + cpu); >>>> + kfree(dev); >>>> + goto out_fail; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> +out: >>>> + return ret; >>>> >>>> - return cpuidle_register(drv, NULL); >>>> +out_fail: >>>> + for (cpu--; cpu <= 0; cpu--) { >>>> + dev = per_cpu(cpuidle_arm_dev, cpu); >>>> + cpuidle_unregister_device(dev); >>>> + kfree(dev); >>>> + } >>>> + cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv); >>>> + goto out; >>>> } >>>> device_initcall(arm_idle_init); >>>> -- >>>> 1.9.1 >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs >> >> Follow Linaro: Facebook | >> Twitter | >> Blog >> -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog