From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] USB: host: ohci-at91: remove useless uclk clock
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:55:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5510378D.9060009@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1503171501110.1061-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Le 17/03/2015 20:02, Alan Stern a ?crit :
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
>> Now that the system clock driver is forwarding set_rate request to the
>> parent clock, we can safely call clk_set_rate on the system clk and get
>> rid of the uclk field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Hi Alan,
As I don't have any other "drivers" patch for 4.1, would you mind taking
this patch with your tree?
I'll take care of the remaining ones dealing with Device Tree: they are
independent anyway.
Thanks, bye.
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 16:15 [PATCH 0/5] USB: atmel: rework clock handling Boris Brezillon
2015-03-17 16:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] USB: ehci-atmel: rework clk handling Boris Brezillon
2015-03-17 19:01 ` Alan Stern
2015-03-18 11:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-18 12:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-18 19:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
2015-03-17 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] USB: host: ohci-at91: remove useless uclk clock Boris Brezillon
2015-03-17 19:02 ` Alan Stern
2015-03-23 15:55 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-03-23 17:23 ` Alan Stern
2015-03-17 16:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] USB: atmel: update DT bindings documentation Boris Brezillon
2015-03-17 16:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: at91/dt: remove useless uhpck clock references from ehci defintions Boris Brezillon
2015-03-17 16:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: at91/dt: remove useless usb clock Boris Brezillon
2015-05-22 9:15 ` [PATCH 0/5] USB: atmel: rework clock handling Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5510378D.9060009@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).