From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: dw: use relaxed IO accessor
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:19:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5512851.aA4Sb0uIYP@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160919090041.4024-1-jszhang@marvell.com>
On Monday, September 19, 2016 5:00:41 PM CEST Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Using the __raw functions is discouraged. Update the driver to use the
> relaxed functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
This should mention that it fixes the driver for big-endian kernels.
However, it seems that the fix is only correct for the MMIO
registers, while the polled FIFO access is now wrong AFAICT,
both reader and writer:
static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
{
u32 max = rx_max(dws);
u16 rxw;
while (max--) {
rxw = dw_read_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR);
/* Care rx only if the transfer's original "rx" is not null */
if (dws->rx_end - dws->len) {
if (dws->n_bytes == 1)
*(u8 *)(dws->rx) = rxw;
else
*(u16 *)(dws->rx) = rxw;
}
dws->rx += dws->n_bytes;
}
}
As the FIFO is a byte stream, we have to use a non-swapping
accessor here, such as readsl() which would also take care of the
loop. The "n_bytes == 1" case probably should look like e.g.
*(u8 *)(dws->rx) = *(u8 *)&rxw;
so you are sure to get the first byte of the rxw variable
rather than the lower 8 bits.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> index 61bc3cb..2cfdc4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h
> @@ -143,22 +143,22 @@ struct dw_spi {
>
> static inline u32 dw_readl(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset)
> {
> - return __raw_readl(dws->regs + offset);
> + return readl_relaxed(dws->regs + offset);
> }
>
> static inline u16 dw_readw(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset)
> {
> - return __raw_readw(dws->regs + offset);
> + return readw_relaxed(dws->regs + offset);
> }
>
What is the reason for using readl_relaxed() rather than the
normal readl() here? In almost all instances that these are
called, you don't care about the added latency and should just
default to the normal I/O functions.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-19 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 9:00 [PATCH] spi: dw: use relaxed IO accessor Jisheng Zhang
2016-09-19 10:19 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5512851.aA4Sb0uIYP@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox