[PATCH 01/25] arm: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0

[pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)]

On 31/03/2015 01:45, Joe Perches wrote:
> Use the normal return values for bool functions
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |  8 ++++----
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c  | 14 +++++++-------
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index b52101d..166e1e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -151,18 +151,18 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
>  	u64 limit, mask;
>  
>  	if (!dev->dma_mask)
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	mask = *dev->dma_mask;
>  
>  	limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
>  	if (limit && size > limit)
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	if ((addr | (addr + size - 1)) & ~mask)
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
> -	return 1;
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void dma_mark_clean(void *addr, size_t size) { }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index a9c80a2..ad200a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long hcr)
>  
>  static inline bool vcpu_mode_is_32bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return 1;
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned long *vcpu_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> index 78af6d8..897f9fb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int pwrdm_disable_hdwr_sar(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
>   */
>  bool pwrdm_has_hdwr_sar(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
>  {
> -	return (pwrdm && pwrdm->flags & PWRDM_HAS_HDWR_SAR) ? 1 : 0;
> +	return pwrdm && (pwrdm->flags & PWRDM_HAS_HDWR_SAR);
>  }
>  
>  int pwrdm_state_switch_nolock(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
> @@ -1185,24 +1185,24 @@ bool pwrdm_can_ever_lose_context(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
>  	if (!pwrdm) {
>  		pr_debug("powerdomain: %s: invalid powerdomain pointer\n",
>  			 __func__);
> -		return 1;
> +		return true;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (pwrdm->pwrsts & PWRSTS_OFF)
> -		return 1;
> +		return true;
>  
>  	if (pwrdm->pwrsts & PWRSTS_RET) {
>  		if (pwrdm->pwrsts_logic_ret & PWRSTS_OFF)
> -			return 1;
> +			return true;
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < pwrdm->banks; i++)
>  			if (pwrdm->pwrsts_mem_ret[i] & PWRSTS_OFF)
> -				return 1;
> +				return true;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < pwrdm->banks; i++)
>  		if (pwrdm->pwrsts_mem_on[i] & PWRSTS_OFF)
> -			return 1;
> +			return true;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return false;
>  }
> 

Marc/Christoffer, please pick this up yourself.

Paolo