From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: LDP: next-20150402: twl4030 regression?
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:45:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5522D442.9090905@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150406152750.GE11160@saruman.tx.rr.com>
On 04/06/2015 10:27 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:17:37AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 04/06/2015 10:01 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:58:29PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 08:53:36AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> at least a description of the problem you're seeing and some attempt at
>>>
>>>>> Test was a simple boot test. There seems to be a lockdep reported at the
>>>>> very least in the log provided (see
>>>>> https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/blob/next-20150402/omap2plus_defconfig/ldp.txt#L488
>>>>> ).
>>>
>>>> I think what Mark is trying to say is to include a fuller description of
>>>> the problem, and don't expect people to fire up their web browser to get
>>>> a basic overview of what the problem is.
>>>
>>> Yes, indeed. I hadn't actually opened the links, I might've got round
>>> to it later on.
>>>
>>>> My guess is that the problem _appears_ to be that someone's added a call
>>>> to debug_check_no_locks_held() into schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock()
>>>> without considering what this means.
>>>
>>>> What it means is that you can't now use usleep_range() from within any
>>>> driver probe function - which is absolutely absurd.
>>>
>>> I can't think of any regulator side changes which might be relevant in
>>> that period. It's possible that there might be something in the MFD I
>>> guess.
>>>
>>
>> Ran a few tests since my original email..
>>
>> 6261b06de565baafa590e58a531a1a5522cea0b6 ("regulator: Defer lookup of
>> supply to regulator_get") was the only patch that was introduced in
>> the interval. there seems nothing in mfd either.
>>
>> I still have the following in my log.. trying to further down.
>
> I noticed a similar warning with AM437x SK
>
posting intermediate debug results:
I did a bisect on the merge commits to identify which tree the
regression got introduced, looks like it is the merge from akpm tree -
I have not yet looked deeper.
b58a6c0b0808 Merge branch 'akpm-current/current'
---> FAIL http://paste.ubuntu.org.cn/2540641
ef31288bdf44 Merge remote-tracking branch 'livepatching/for-next'
--> OK -> http://paste.ubuntu.org.cn/2540778
Felipe, could you confirm on your end as well on SK (my fs does not
use systemd unfortunately)?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-06 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 13:21 LDP: next-20150402: twl4030 regression? Nishanth Menon
2015-04-06 13:45 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-06 13:53 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-06 13:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-06 15:01 ` Mark Brown
2015-04-06 15:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-06 15:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-04-06 18:45 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2015-04-08 16:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-04-08 21:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5522D442.9090905@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).