From: dave.long@linaro.org (David Long)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 07:01:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55250A71.6060200@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHM4w1=84w40VCKyEtGfqYEziZaqgRWG6O7TGn+w1CeQuPyVPg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/08/15 02:07, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:41 AM, David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
>>
>> Add support for basic kernel probes(kprobes) and jump probes
>> (jprobes) for ARM64.
>>
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>> +static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + /* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
>> + if (!user_mode(regs)) {
>> + preempt_disable();
>> + if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, esr))
>> + ret = 1;
>> + preempt_enable();
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> Please fix this definition in next revision, other wise there would be
> a build error
> if CONFIG_KPROBES is not defined.
>
>
> should be:
>
> +static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>
>
> ~Pratyush
>
Yes, the fix is already in the v6 version I'm working on.
-dl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-08 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 23:11 [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
2015-02-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2015-02-18 14:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-03-25 13:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-04-20 7:15 ` David Long
2015-02-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
2015-02-18 15:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2015-02-18 14:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-27 6:38 ` David Long
2015-02-27 8:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-04-08 6:07 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-04-08 11:01 ` David Long [this message]
2015-02-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2015-03-06 11:39 ` Steve Capper
2015-03-06 14:42 ` David Long
2015-02-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
2015-02-19 14:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-02-17 23:11 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2015-02-19 14:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55250A71.6060200@linaro.org \
--to=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).