From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: check IRQ number on userland injection
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:52:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5527FFB5.9020103@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5527EC52.4050500@codeaurora.org>
Hi Christopher,
On 10/04/15 16:29, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 04/10/2015 11:17 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> When userland injects a SPI via the KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl we currently
>> only check it against a fixed limit, which historically is set
>> to 127. With the new dynamic IRQ allocation the effective limit may
>> actually be smaller (64).
>> So when now a malicious or buggy userland injects a SPI in that
>> range, we spill over on our VGIC bitmaps and bytemaps memory.
>> I could trigger a host kernel NULL pointer dereference with current
>> mainline by injecting some bogus IRQ number from a hacked kvmtool:
>
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -195,7 +195,11 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_IRQ 0
>> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_FIQ 1
>>
>> -/* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */
>> +/*
>> + * This used to hold the highest supported SPI, but it is now obsolete
>> + * and only here to provide source code level compatibility with older
>> + * userland. The highest SPI number can be set via KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_NR_IRQS.
>> + */
>> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127
>
> If that's the case should it maybe only defined when __KERNEL__ is not defined?
Mmmh, I am not sure it's really worth the hassle. Actually it seems like
that neither kvmtool nor QEMU use this definition, so it's more or less
orphaned by now. I am confident we can avoid it sneaking in in the
kernel again.
Cheers,
Andre.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-10 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-10 15:17 [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: check IRQ number on userland injection Andre Przywara
2015-04-10 15:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-10 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-10 16:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-10 15:29 ` Christopher Covington
2015-04-10 16:52 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2015-04-13 10:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-13 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-13 10:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-04-13 10:21 ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-13 10:02 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5527FFB5.9020103@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).