linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com (Masami Hiramatsu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/6] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:42:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55363791.4070706@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429561187-3661-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>

(2015/04/21 5:19), David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
> 
> This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches,
> first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by
> reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing.
> 
> This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes)
> and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64.
> 
> The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping
> support available in the ARM v8 kernel.
> 
[...]
> Changes since v5 include:
> 
> 1) Replaced installation of breakpoint hook with direct call from the
> handlers in debug-monitors.c, as requested.
> 2) Reject probing of instructions that read the interrupt mask, in
> addition to instructions that set it.
> 3) Cleaned up comments describing usage of Debug Mask.
> 4) Added KPROBE_REENTER case in reenter_kprobe.
> 5) Corrected the ifdef'd definitions for notify_page_fault() to be
> consistent when KPROBES is not configed.
> 6) Changed "cpsr" to "pstate" for HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature.
> 7) Added back in missing new files in previous patch.
> 8) Changed two instances of pr_warning() to pr_warn().

Looks OK to me:)
BTW, have you tried to build and test this with CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT?
If so, you can also test it by tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest.

> Note that there seems to be at least a potential issue with kprobes
> on multiple (possibly all) platforms having to do with use of kfree
> inside of the kretprobes trampoline handler.  This has manifested
> occasionally in systemtap testing on arm64.  There does not appear to
> be an simple solution to the problem.

No, trampoline handler must call recycle_rp_inst() instead of kfree
to return kretprobe instance to the pool. Hmm, I should look into it.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept.
Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering
Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-21 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-20 20:19 [PATCH v6 0/6] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
2015-04-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2015-05-20 13:39   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-21  3:29     ` David Long
2015-05-21 17:55       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-22 17:05         ` David Long
2015-04-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
2015-04-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2015-05-20 16:39   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-21  4:44     ` David Long
2015-05-22 11:00       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-22 15:49         ` William Cohen
2015-05-22 16:54           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-22 16:57             ` David Long
2015-04-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2015-04-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
2015-04-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2015-04-21 11:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2015-04-21 14:07   ` [PATCH v6 0/6] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support William Cohen
2015-04-24 21:14   ` William Cohen
2015-04-28  2:58     ` William Cohen
2015-04-29 10:23       ` Will Deacon
2015-05-02  1:44         ` William Cohen
2015-05-05  5:14           ` David Long
2015-05-05 15:48             ` Will Deacon
2015-05-05 16:18               ` William Cohen
2015-05-05 21:02               ` William Cohen
2015-05-06  3:14                 ` William Cohen
2015-05-12  5:54               ` David Long
2015-05-12 12:48                 ` William Cohen
2015-05-13  9:22                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-13 15:41                     ` William Cohen
2015-05-13 19:58                       ` David Long
2015-05-13 20:35                         ` William Cohen
2015-05-14  0:01                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-14  3:48                         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2015-04-29  4:33   ` David Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55363791.4070706@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).