From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mugunthanvnm@ti.com (Mugunthan V N)
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:27:06 +0530
Subject: [BUG?] drivers: net:ethernet: cpsw: add support for VLAN
In-Reply-To: <1429741702.29353.28.camel@mars>
References: <1429741702.29353.28.camel@mars>
Message-ID: <5539DB32.3050203@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thursday 23 April 2015 03:58 AM, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  has commit 3b72c2fe0c6bbec42e ("drivers: net:ethernet: cpsw: add
> support for VLAN") introduced a bug by defining CPSW_VLAN_AWARE as
> BIT(1) instead of BIT(2)?
> 
> +#define CPSW_VLAN_AWARE		BIT(1)
> <snip>
>  	/* switch to vlan unaware mode */
> -	cpsw_ale_control_set(priv->ale, 0, ALE_VLAN_AWARE, 0);
> +	cpsw_ale_control_set(priv->ale, priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN_AWARE,
> +			     CPSW_ALE_VLAN_AWARE);
> +	control_reg = readl(&priv->regs->control);
> +	control_reg |= CPSW_VLAN_AWARE;
> +	writel(control_reg, &priv->regs->control);
> 
> See TRM [1] page 1980 (14.5.1.2 CONTROL Register), there bit
> CPSW_VLAN_AWARE is number 2.
> 
> I didn't do any tests, just stumbled upon.
> 
> [1]: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruh73l/spruh73l.pdf
> 

Its bug in TRM, will check with TRM team and update here.

Regards
Mugunthan V N