From: rnayak@codeaurora.org (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] arm: dts: qcom: Add #power-domain-cells property
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:25:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553A2106.1030102@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFoph2TQeSS6XE_UpOPHiZy5tRZWFvUSqccv7rjtHOprsg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/24/2015 03:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 April 2015 at 15:12, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> msm8974 has gcc and mmcc nodes, and apq8084 has a gcc node which
>> implement gdsc powerdomains. Add the #power-domain-cells property
>> to them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 1 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> index 1f130bc..55c281c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@
>> compatible = "qcom,gcc-apq8084";
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> #reset-cells = <1>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>
> So the PM domain will be apart of the clock-controller. That's a bit
> odd, but I guess the hardware is like that!?
Yes, the gdscs are all part of GCC controller.
>
> Anyway, what I fail to understand from this patchset is who will be
> the actual consumer of the PM domain? In other words, what devices
> will hold the below property in its DT node?
>
> power_domains = <phandle index>;
>
> This is needed for genpd to have the device at probe time, attached to
> its PM domain.
Any device which belongs to the collapsible power domain (gdsc)
Examples are graphics, camera, video encode/decode block (venus) etc
>
>> reg = <0xfc400000 0x4000>;
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> index e265ec1..6184d32 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@
>> compatible = "qcom,gcc-msm8974";
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> #reset-cells = <1>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> reg = <0xfc400000 0x4000>;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@
>> compatible = "qcom,mmcc-msm8974";
>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>> #reset-cells = <1>;
>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> reg = <0xfd8c0000 0x6000>;
>> };
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 13:12 [PATCH v5 00/11] Add support for QCOM GDSCs Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] clk: qcom: Add support for GDSCs Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Prepare common clk probe to register gdscs Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in msm8916 GCC Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in msm8974 GCC Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in msm8974 MMCC Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in apq8084 GCC Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in apq8084 MMCC Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] arm: dts: qcom: Add #power-domain-cells property Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-24 9:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-24 10:55 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2015-04-24 11:00 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-24 15:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-27 2:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-27 7:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-27 9:33 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Use PM clocks to control gdsc clocks Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-30 15:26 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-05-12 3:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Enable an RCG before turning on the gdsc Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-14 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add oxili GDSC for msm8916 Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553A2106.1030102@codeaurora.org \
--to=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).