[PATCH Part1 v11 5/5] PCI: iproc: Use pci_scan_root_bus() instead of pci_create_root_bus()

[wangyijing@huawei.com (Yijing Wang)]

>> @@ -210,10 +210,10 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
>>  
>>  	pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie;
>>  
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops,
>> +	bus = pci_scan_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops,
>>  				  &pcie->sysdata, pcie->resources);
>>  	if (!bus) {
>> -		dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n");
>> +		dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to scan PCI root bus\n");
>>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>>  		goto err_power_off_phy;
>>  	}
> 
> iproc_pcie_check_link is called here by using the 'bus' structure
> returned from pci_create_root_bus. In iproc_pcie_check_link, we
> configure root bus class to PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI and validate to ensure
> a stable link between RC and EP can be detected.

Oh, I got it. Thanks for your explanation.

> 
>> @@ -227,7 +227,6 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
>>  
>>  	iproc_pcie_enable(pcie);
> 
> Here we enable INTx support for our RC controller.
> 
>>  
>> -	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> 
> Here, if pci_scan_child_bus is moved to before iproc_pcie_check_link, I
> don't think it would work (although I have not tested this).
> 
> An alternative is to use a dummy bus structure to feed into
> iproc_pcie_check_link, and call iproc_pcie_check_link and
> iproc_pcie_enable before pci_scan_root_bus. But the reason I put the
> link check code in between pci_create_root_bus and pci_scan_child_bus
> was to avoid using a dummy bus structure, :)

Maybe we could refactor this by add a new pci_host_bridge_ops in the later patch.

> 
>>  	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>>  	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>>  	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ray
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing