From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com (Suravee Suthikulpanit) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:45:43 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Parse _CCA and setup device coherency In-Reply-To: <5542288.z0SSOZ4xV7@wuerfel> References: <1430315049-4663-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1430315049-4663-3-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <5542288.z0SSOZ4xV7@wuerfel> Message-ID: <5540EE97.70202@amd.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/29/2015 09:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 08:44:09 Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: >> + device->flags.cca_seen = 1; >> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA)) { >> + /* >> + * Architecture has specified that if the device >> + * can do DMA, it must have ACPI _CCA object. >> + * Here, there could be two cases: >> + * 1. Not DMA-able device. >> + * 2. DMA-able device, but missing _CCA object. >> + * >> + * In both cases, we will default to dma non-coherent. >> + */ >> + cca = 0; >> + } else { >> + /* >> + * If architecture does not specify that device must >> + * specify ACPI _CCA (e.g. x86), we default to use >> + * dma coherent. >> + */ >> + cca = 1; >> + } >> > > What does it mean here if a device does DMA but is not coherent? Do you > have an example of a server that needs this? > > Can we please make the default for ARM64 cca=1 as well? > > Arnd > Actually, I am trying to implement the logic for when missing _CCA to be consistent with the behavior when the devicetree entry does not specify "dma-coherent" property. IIUC, in such case, Linux will default to using non-coherent DMA. Thanks, Suravee