From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:00:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Add idle-states for Juno In-Reply-To: <1430402268.2868.20.camel@linaro.org> References: <1430402268.2868.20.camel@linaro.org> Message-ID: <554251B4.2030808@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 30/04/15 14:57, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > From: Jon Medhurst > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst > --- > > These have been kicking around out of tree for ages, any reason they > shouldn't be in mainline? One possible reason could be that these values are not tuned(e.g. latency values, can they be same for both clusters ?) Though these reasons are not blocking and this patch will not cause any functionality break even if is merged as is. Regards, Sudeep