From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia) Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 17:18:59 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: dove: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 In-Reply-To: <553FB6B4.8020401@gmail.com> References: <1430125744-3550-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20150428155910.GD12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <553FB6B4.8020401@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5543DFB3.6040407@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/28/2015 01:35 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 28.04.2015 17:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >>> The current implicit GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it >>> very impractical for other software components licensed under another >>> license. >>> >>> In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees, >>> relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license. >>> > [...] >>> so I decided to keep the whole relicensing in a single patch. Please >>> send >>> your Acked-by's in reply to this patch if you are happy with the >>> relicensing. >> >> I normally don't include the "or later version" for my license changes >> as I've only accepted to contribute under the terms of GPLv2. > > Ok, I guess this is a NACK for GPLv2+ but an Acked-by if we limit the > GPL part to GPLv2 only? > > If so, is everybody else who already Acked the GPLv2+ part also fine > with reducing the GPL version to "version 2 only" ? > Yeah, I'm fine with this. Acked-by: Ezequiel Garcia -- Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com